Brand Reduces Your Cost of Selling
I am sure most of the readers must be aware of the classic experiment done to know the value of the Brand. In this experiment business minded people were asked, what would happen to the ability of raising funds of the Coca Cola Company if its assets gets destroyed in a fire one day. Most of people said it would only cost time, efforts and money, as it would be very easy for the company to raise funds and re-create its assets around the world again. On the other hand, if because of some reason all customers of Coca Cola Company taken sick of partial amnesia one fine morning, the answer given by people was that Coca Cola would not remain Coca Cola despite its having all assets around the world intact. Therefore, the value resides in the minds of customers and not in company’s assets. This is value of the Brand.
Time and again, it has been
proved that brand creates a business for a company and not a product. Products are only a means. There are
instances in our life, proving to us that we buy only brand and not the products.
Yes, sometimes confusion may arise when you buy a product which is ‘not-so-known’
to you or a product is sold to you by the shopkeeper, saying it is a good
product or even better than the product you are looking for. Your not knowing about
a brand does not mean that a brand does not exist. Possibility is there that the product you bought, represent the extreme end of ‘not-Known-to-you’ brand.
We do buy only a brand and not
a product. Seems quite philosophical in nature, but it is the fact. The challenge one however, can face in
deciding whether it is a ‘Known’ brand or ‘Unknown’. You may be surprised by my
creating a new category of something called ‘Unknown’ brand. Yes, there it
exists. I simply mean here is that it is not possible for a customer to remember
entire range of brands in a particular category. Bust as the product exist, so
does the brand.
Branding is the process of
creating distinctive and durable images about products in the minds of customers.
Therefore, branding does create a space in the mind of a customer. The real challenge
is how to use the mind of customer which is a finite resource. On the other hand,
market is flooded with enormous information. A customer is not capable to
retain all brands related information and call the information at the time of
requirement. It thus means companies need to do something which invariably - by
design & even by default –its brand is recalled by its customers, time
& again at the split of a second; as decisions, are taken so quickly by customers.
Any slipping at the moment of customer’s taking a decision, will lead to
switching of customers to some other ‘recently seen’ brand. Interestingly, it
has been found that customers many a times end up choosing products that are
easier to purchase rather than best for their purchase.
In a study it has been found
that around 95% products launched in the world, fail within a year of their
launch. Still, companies keep innovating and spending millions of dollars on
R&D, every year. Reason of this spending is only one. A new product if at all
succeeds in finding a place in the mind of customer, is much more than the cost
incurred on it. But, the success is less on the product features and more due
to finding a place in the mind of a potential customer. The companies do every bit
& trick to get their brands registered within the mind of its customers.
This helps companies, attracting to its products, every time a customer takes a
decision to buy a product in a particular category.
If I put it in other words,
it is a brand which change ‘me too’ commodity into a
‘must have’ purchase, helping your product to stand out in an increasingly
cluttered marketplace.
Insightful is the thought
that once established, a product gets sold on its own. It makes a company sale
its products at lesser cost because company does start incurring lesser cost on buying space in the external world, like shop & retailer counters etc. So big is the gain, still companies do try doing all
other things to cut the cost except investing in its branding and en-cashing it
for many years; giving them the benefit
of lesser cost of selling and better profit margins.
My writing this note is one
and only one. If branding helps in reducing the ‘cost of Selling a product’
than why CEOs are reluctant and see branding cost, as an expenditure and not an investment? Generally, CEOs keep
harping on the need of following Cost Leadership Strategy in today’s mostly ‘commoditized
market’, but turn their face to some thing else to achieve it. Isn't it the case, with you reader?
Secondly, each & every
company strive to shift its products from ‘one
end of Unknown category to the other end of Known’. It means, try
converting a commodity product into a ‘Different Product’. Only reason of doing so is to lower the cost of product as more &more products will sell and sometimes intention is to get 'premium' on it too.
The branding gives a
company a much stronger platform for growth through
new products/markets and retailer distribution, once brand is established.
It leads to creating a brand that helps to build engaging, long term
relationships with your customers. Although, looking at the brand value, many
companies have started investing heavily in their brands. Top twenty brands in
the world together valued around $ 800 billion. Coca-cola alone stands at $80
billion. Companies can’t even think creating a business of that magnitude. Although,
companies have realised the importance of branding and even have started showing
their brand values on their balance sheet, it is still to be used a weapon to
make a profit.
CEOs, it is not only manufacturing a product,
selling a product and try making some margin on it. But if you want to have a
long lasting competitive advantage over your customers, create a brand – that will
sell your products, continuously at lower cost; giving your companies better
than average profit margins. I hope you look for that more than manufacturing
& selling. Isn’t it?? So, start
investing and create wealth for your stakeholders.
Comments
Post a Comment